An openly licensed reproduction of this painting has not been verified. View the picture through its museum record.
A study against the weather record
George Inness
Saco Ford: Conway Meadows
The museum suggests that some white forms may be railway smoke or steam. What can the records establish about this landscape and its sky?
Railway context supportedPainted weather unknown
The Nephos method
How this study was read
The method in fullWhat is written
The museum dates the canvas to 1876. A contemporary notice, preserved in a modern transcription, places Inness sketching in North Conway in June 1875. The weather comparison covers that campaign’s calendar summer, not a documented period of work on this canvas.
George Inness and son, and John A. Monks are at the Kearsarge House, North Conway, sketching in the vicinity.
Boston Evening Transcript, 1 June 1875, quoted by White Mountain Art & Artists; original issue not inspectedsmoke or steam rather than clouds
Mount Holyoke College Art Museum, Look and Learn, p. 5; conditional interpretation in indexed text, original PDF unavailable
Records of those days
- Portland, Maine: NOAA/NCEI daily precipitationJune–August 1875; coastal regional context. Missing-presumed-zero flags remain unknown, not confirmed dry days.
- NOAA/CDMP–MRCC Portland register and station historyA second transcription of the same station record. A disagreement in a July rain amount is retained; this is not an independent gauge.
- Portland Daily Press, 7 July 1875, p. 4An Eastern Railroad advertisement explicitly names a train connection to North Conway. The scan was read and the excerpt is reproduced.
Not found or not yet searched
- The painting’s execution day, place of execution and particular preparatory studies have not been established.
- No accepted daily North Conway weather series or dated local weather witness was obtained.
- No openly licensed reproduction of this painting was verified; the holder’s page is linked.
Each claim tested
- Does the canvas date identify the weather to compare? No. The museum’s 1876 date and the documented 1875 campaign are different kinds of evidence; neither dates this painted sky.
- Could the low white forms belong to a railway? A contemporary timetable supports the presence of service to North Conway. It does not identify a train, track or plume in the painting.
- Can Portland’s rain validate the sky? The daily entries establish rainfall at the coastal station during the campaign’s summer. They cannot establish the weather at the painted viewpoint.
Verdict
The records support a Conway campaign and contemporary railway service. The museum’s possible smoke or steam remains an interpretation, and the painted weather remains undated.
- Partially agreesRailway context Service to North Conway is documented; a painted plume is not identified.
- UnknownWeather of the canvas No dated scene or local observation can be matched.
What this cannot tell you. June–August 1875 is a seasonal frame, not an itinerary. Herbert’s relative execution date precedes Williston Hall’s November 1876 opening and is consistent with the museum’s 1876 year. The summit station and Portland are not substitutes for the meadow. No claim of a painted storm day, climate ranking or modern anomaly is made.
Step 1 · The picture and the campaign
A canvas date is not a weather date
Mount Holyoke catalogues Saco Ford: Conway Meadows as 1876. The picture belongs to Inness’s engagement with North Conway, where familiar scenery became a vehicle for changing light and atmosphere. Nicolai Cikovsky’s account of the Conway campaign, quoted in a Christie’s essay, describes a shift “from natural monuments to natural moments”. That is a reading of his artistic emphasis, not evidence of a particular storm.
A notice dated 1 June 1875 places Inness, his son and John A. Monks at the Kearsarge House, sketching nearby. It survives here through White Mountain Art & Artists’ transcription; the original newspaper issue has not been inspected. A catalogue-based account of the campaign also places it in the summer of 1875. No object-specific letter, dated field study or execution record has been established for this canvas.
Robert L. Herbert’s college history places execution in the summer before Williston Hall opened in November 1876, consistent with the museum’s 1876 date. The museum’s teaching guide says the painting followed a summer there. These accounts do not establish whether this canvas was completed in the field or in a later studio session.
The weather frame is 1 June–31 August 1875, 92 calendar days. It gives seasonal context for the documented campaign, not an arrival-to-departure itinerary or the dates when this picture was painted. A second summer visit in 1876 has not been verified in the sources used here.
“George Inness and son, and John A. Monks are at the Kearsarge House, North Conway, sketching in the vicinity.”
Boston Evening Transcript, 1 June 1875, as transcribed by White Mountain Art & Artists; original issue not inspected.
Step 2 · Read the white forms carefully
A railway is documented; a plume is not
The museum’s Look and Learn guide, p. 5, distinguishes the large gray clouds from lower white forms near the distant hills. It offers a conditional interpretation: the white forms may be “smoke or steam rather than clouds”, from a train hidden by trees. The guide’s indexed text was available; its original PDF could not be retrieved. The suggestion remains the museum’s interpretation, not an identified cloud type or a confirmed train.
The Portland Daily Press of 7 July 1875 provides a small but concrete check. Its Eastern Railroad advertisement names a connection to North Conway. Railway service was part of the setting during the campaign’s summer. The advertisement does not locate the track within this view, identify a passing locomotive, or establish what the white paint represents.
This leaves a different question from simply asking whether it rained: how does the picture combine a familiar landscape, weather and a possible trace of transport? No preparatory comparison has been found that would show Inness adding, moving or removing a train or a cloud.
“The 9.00 A. M. Train from Portland connects at Conway Junction with the 8.00 A. M. train from Boston for North Conway.”
Portland Daily Press, 7 July 1875, p. 4, Eastern Railroad advertisement

Step 3 · A regional record
Rain at Portland cannot identify a Conway sky
The NOAA/NCEI daily file for Portland, Maine has entries for all 92 days of the comparison. Its historical station at 4 Exchange Street was 82.9 km from the North Conway town reference point in a straight line. The actual painted viewpoint is unknown. This is a coastal record, not an observation in the meadow or on Mount Washington.
21 daily entries record at least 1 mm of precipitation. The table counts only recorded amounts that meet that threshold. It does not count all rainy days, identify thunderstorms, or tell whether cloud hid any mountain. Rain at one station does not establish the sky at another.
There are 59 entries flagged P, meaning missing presumed zero in NOAA’s documentation. They remain unknown here. No rainfall total, run of dry days or wetness ranking is derived from them.
A second transcription, NOAA/CDMP–MRCC, records 0.50 inches (12.7 mm) on 6 July; GHCN gives 13.5 mm. Either amount exceeds the counting threshold, but the exact amount is unresolved. These are two transcriptions of the same station, not independent weather witnesses. The daily accumulation boundary is not established.
| Month | Daily entries | Entries ≥ 1 mm | Presumed zeros |
|---|---|---|---|
| June | 30 | 7 | 20 |
| July | 31 | 6 | 18 |
| August | 31 | 8 | 21 |
Every daily entry and its status
| 1875 | Precipitation, mm | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 1 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 2 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 3 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 4 June | 0.3 | Reported amount |
| 5 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 6 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 7 June | 4.6 | Reported amount |
| 8 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 9 June | 0.5 | Reported amount |
| 10 June | 63.5 | Reported amount |
| 11 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 12 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 13 June | 2.3 | Reported amount |
| 14 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 15 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 16 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 17 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 18 June | 31.8 | Reported amount |
| 19 June | 14.2 | Reported amount |
| 20 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 21 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 22 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 23 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 24 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 25 June | 0.5 | Reported amount |
| 26 June | 19.1 | Reported amount |
| 27 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 28 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 29 June | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 30 June | 3.3 | Reported amount |
| 1 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 2 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 3 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 4 July | 2.5 | Reported amount |
| 5 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 6 July | 13.5 | GHCN transcription; MRCC gives 12.7 mm. Exact amount unresolved. |
| 7 July | 3.0 | Reported amount |
| 8 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 9 July | 0.3 | Reported amount |
| 10 July | 10.2 | Reported amount |
| 11 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 12 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 13 July | 0.8 | Reported amount |
| 14 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 15 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 16 July | 0.5 | Reported amount |
| 17 July | 0.3 | Reported amount |
| 18 July | 0.3 | Reported amount |
| 19 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 20 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 21 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 22 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 23 July | 10.9 | Reported amount |
| 24 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 25 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 26 July | 0.5 | Reported amount |
| 27 July | 3.0 | Reported amount |
| 28 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 29 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 30 July | 0.3 | Reported amount |
| 31 July | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 1 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 2 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 3 August | 23.4 | Reported amount |
| 4 August | 2.5 | Reported amount |
| 5 August | 8.1 | Reported amount |
| 6 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 7 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 8 August | 2.8 | Reported amount |
| 9 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 10 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 11 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 12 August | 6.4 | Reported amount |
| 13 August | 1.0 | Reported amount |
| 14 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 15 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 16 August | 0.5 | Reported amount |
| 17 August | 0.5 | Reported amount |
| 18 August | 20.8 | Reported amount |
| 19 August | 2.5 | Reported amount |
| 20 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 21 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 22 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 23 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 24 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 25 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 26 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 27 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 28 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 29 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 30 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
| 31 August | Unknown | P: missing presumed zero |
Step 4 · What the comparison can decide
The setting has records; the painted moment does not
The documentary record supports a Conway campaign in 1875 and railway service during its summer. The rain file supplies regional context. None of these sources fixes the weather of the canvas catalogued 1876. The museum’s possible smoke or steam cannot be confirmed or dismissed by Portland’s rain gauge.
No accepted daily weather series for North Conway or dated local weather witness was obtained in this search. The Signal Service station on Mount Washington is a distinct candidate, not the present Observatory, which began in 1932; summit weather would still need to be kept separate from the valley. An object-specific field study, dated letter or technical comparison could narrow how this picture was made. Until then, its date of observation, its precise weather and the identity of those white forms remain open.
Sources
Every source on this page
Weather calculations use cached files checked against their sha256 fingerprints. The source entries distinguish original documents, extracted text, a modern transcription and indexed text. A fingerprint preserves the version used; it does not resolve a source’s uncertainty.
- Mount Holyoke College Art Museum, Art of the United States
sha256 d77dd509f3fb794d0792748fec61ba23d2f31b643cc53ef5b67001fec865a051 - Mount Holyoke College Art Museum, Annual Report 2016–2017
sha256 7be7b0ee359de4db1e484e479f620fde7a1d40f435d20246e952adfbd7dfc1b4 - Text extracted from the museum annual report
sha256 a20689249da14db363c28493f7532bc6571348ddcdec51fd9ef0034cc857e975 - Mount Holyoke, Look and Learn, indexed text of p. 5
sha256 cf52e264f3a48f9963cd2eb23d0e7f640268577cc88341141562e993d03141fe - Boston Evening Transcript, 1 June 1875, quoted by White Mountain Art & Artists
sha256 219dd7b6a7e706965d66db6c3b45a424563793d3de145bc1e5905c3510d0d042 - Christie’s, Conway Valley, lot essay citing Michael Quick (2007)
sha256 22891ea681b742893b68674c9c0e030637cec5b59a64d1defa6770c0a482b8dc - Christie’s, North Conway, quoting Nicolai Cikovsky (1985), p. 128
sha256 8667e8cfa4a6ff583a01381f098dabbde4b69dfcb7ba6c77eeeb61ce41558f83 - Robert L. Herbert, History of Art at Mount Holyoke College, 1872–1914 (2018)
sha256 adfc7083869c872b407e348d9637ea11fd6cc0757d30fe1ea58c6531d30ccd47 - Text extracted from Herbert (2018)
sha256 45ec06c1c9d5ed18e6cdd52a13be9ecfd6d5bae664cc0b9e899123b39924a761 - NOAA/NCEI GHCN-Daily, Portland, Maine, USC00176902
sha256 a7850acbddcc6edde5f32347110bb88cb6e74dad65d385aef148e1a476fbece4 - NOAA/NCEI GHCN-Daily format and flag definitions
sha256 0e4e6f0e6947cf1add884c328a01760f31c56ef5fb86b85ed57dd5dc4c4aeaa6 - NOAA/CDMP–MRCC keyed Portland daily record
sha256 dd1ad8cf2675a10f20c94a8d100d0936fce1cdc16b8f0143d665e9b8f00ec2ee - MRCC Portland station history
sha256 ccc3e8619e2e5bde7cacade6bfc85856f4fb548fac13a5b5cf3a84a8e8185e6d - GeoNames 5090347, North Conway
sha256 7a5247656564271b41013791ff340fd3a066f896a395729d3b26bae44574ceb3 - Portland Daily Press, 7 July 1875
sha256 e1aa1b0500816eb3a60dfe4a01481ae0cc085690f7dddcb0313c876595569cc9 - Nephos transcription of the Eastern Railroad advertisement
sha256 a658503ec262f6e0409474bf4c5511764672b2e2d9d362b5d3ff9ba3273aea65 - Mount Washington Observatory, Our History, Peter Crane
sha256 50e26ee9f366c391636e7d2d376fb9fee3d98747dd566d89820ce0b8bee89ab1 - NOAA/NCDC, DSI-3297 CDMP format documentation (March 2010)
sha256 3ade954c6c3f982ce8ab390f776f17cee7dce1b884e33e955a32a780db5a7cdf - Maine State Library record and rights statement, 7 July 1875
sha256 182b681ff8da9f71801f2a15e628c9cb3a923f125111f1054a11f0775188ba75